The Influence of Sustainable Supply Chain Management on Corporate Financial Performance

关键词:

摘要

In recent years, as global concerns about environmental protection, social responsibility, and corporate governance (ESG) continue to rise, sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) has gradually become a core strategic choice for enterprises seeking long-term development. This paper aims to explore the relationship between sustainable supply chain management practices and corporate financial performance. By reviewing relevant theoretical literature and analyzing empirical data from 120 listed companies in the manufacturing and retail industries across Europe and North America from 2018 to 2023, the study identifies key dimensions of SSCM, including green procurement, carbon footprint reduction in logistics, and social responsibility supervision of suppliers. The results show that effective implementation of SSCM has a significant positive impact on corporate financial performance, specifically reflected in improved profit margins, enhanced brand value leading to increased market share, and reduced operational risks that lower cost volatility. Additionally, the study finds that the positive correlation between SSCM and financial performance is more pronounced in enterprises with strong digital management capabilities, as digital tools enable more efficient monitoring and optimization of sustainable supply chain processes. This research provides theoretical support and practical guidance for enterprises to balance sustainable development and financial benefits, and offers insights for policymakers to formulate incentives for SSCM promotion.

文献引用

• 1.11.McKinsey & Company. (2022). Semiconductor shortage: Impact and mitigation strategies for manufacturers. McKinsey Global Institute.​ 2.12.McKinsey & Company. (2023). Global supply chain disruption report 2023. McKinsey Global Institute.​ 3.13.Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 12–25.​ 4.14.Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2019). Blockchain and supply chain management: A state-of-the-art review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 133, 618–635.​ 5.15.Singh, R., Singh, S. P., & Sushil, M. (2022). Supply chain resilience and performance: The moderating role of infrastructure in emerging markets. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(3), 745–768.​ 6.16.Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M., Busby, K., & Zorzini, M. (2015). Supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 53(12), 3520–3539.​ 7.17.U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Occupational outlook handbook: Supply chain analysts. U.S. Department of Labor.​ 8.18.Wang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2021). Supply chain resilience: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(1), 3–32.​ 9.19.World Economic Forum. (2022). The global risks report 2022: Supply chain resilience. World Economic Forum.