The Evaluation of User Satisfaction and ProspectsAnalysis of Shared Bicycle Services

关键词:

摘要

Since their introduction, shared bicycle services have rapidly expanded across Chinese cities and have become a key component of urban micro-mobility. By 2025, with the integration of AI-powered dispatch systems, smart parking, and green transport policies, shared bicycles are increasingly embedded within smart city frameworks. This study investigates user satisfaction and its influencing factors to support service optimization and sustainable development. A stratified three-stage unequal probability sampling method was used to survey 1,080 residents in urban and suburban areas of Beijing. Data analysis incorporated descriptive statistics, logistic regression, principal component analysis, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and text mining. Results indicate strong market penetration of shared bicycles, with dynamic pricing, deposit systems, and smart parking emerging as key user concerns. Age, occupation, and income remain significant determinants of usage frequency. While users express high satisfaction with app functionality and bicycle hardware, cost-effectiveness and safety continue to affect overall experience. Sentiment analysis reveals increasing expectations for environmentally friendly and intelligent mobility solutions. Based on the findings, the study recommends flexible pricing models, safety enhancements, and targeted service strategies to expand user engagement and support the evolution of shared mobility in urban China.

文献引用

• [1] Guo Quanzhong. Can Shared Bikes Take Off? [J]. Internet Economy, 2016(11).
• [2] Bai Wei. Is a Shared Bike Without Profitability a False Proposition? [J]. Internet Weekly, 2017(03).
• [3] Qiu Chunqiang. Are Shared Bikes Truly Part of the Sharing Economy? [J]. Modern Business, 2016(35).
• [4] Li Linfeng. How Can Shared Bikes Achieve Sustainable Profit? A Case Study [J]. Modern Business, 2016(35).
• [5] Xue Qiang. Survey on Chinese Usage of Shared Bicycles [J]. Finance Expo (Wealth), 2017(01).
• [6] Xiao Yue. The Thorny Road of Shared Bikes [J]. Legal Person, 2016(11).
• [7] Yin Xin. Shared Bikes on the Wind: Business or Public Welfare? [J]. China Economic Weekly, 2016(44).
• [8] Zhong Xin. The 'Burning Money' Pace of Shared Bikes [J]. China Brand, 2017(02).
• [9] Wang Xueyu. Shared Bike Management Becomes a Hot Topic in Local Congress 2017 [J]. Financial Technology Times, 2017(02).
• [10] Wen Dongyan. Application of AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation in Electronic Resource Evaluation [J]. Modern Information, 2006(08).
• [11] Zhou Jinghan. Financial Quality Evaluation of Listed Companies Based on Multi-factor Fuzzy Evaluation [J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2003(9).
• [12] Wang Hua, Jin Yongjin. Statistical Data Quality and User Satisfaction: Design and Empirical Research of an Evaluation Scale [J]. Statistical Research, 2010(07).
• [13] Wang Jichuan, Guo Zhigang. Logistic Regression Model—Methods and Applications [M]. Higher Education Press, 2001.
• [14] Yin Jianjie. Review and Application of Logistic Regression Analysis [D]. Master's Thesis, Heilongjiang University, 2011.
• [15] Han Qianqian. The Capital Battle Behind Shared Bikes [J]. China Strategic Emerging Industries, 2017(03).
• [16] He Zhaodong. Will the Shared Bike Market Lead to Oligopoly or Monopoly? [J]. Business Culture, 2017(04).
• [17] Gu Yan. Which Shared Bike is Better? A Comparative Use Record of Mobike and Ofo [J]. China Strategic Emerging Industries, 2016(23).
• [18] Zhou Kunwei. Business Model Analysis in the Era of Sharing Economy—A Case Study of Ofo [J]. Business Manager, 2017(01).
• [19] Jin Hong. Impact of Sharing Economy on Key Statistical Data—Also on the Connotation of Sharing Economy from a Statistical Perspective [J]. World of Survey and Research, 2017(03).
• [20] Wang Fang. Social Capital Enters the Shared Bike Market [J]. China Report, 2017(01).
• [21]Mingming Cheng. A novel approach on the review of the sharing economy literature: co-citation analysis and content analysis[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management.2016(06)
• [22]Jan Brinkmann,Marlin W. Ulmer,Dirk C. Mattfeld. Inventory Routing for Bike Sharing Systems[J]. Transportation Research Procedia.2016(12)
• [23]Svenja Reiss,Klaus Bogenberger.Validation of a Relocation Strategy for Munich’s Bike Sharing System[J]. Transportation Research Procedia.2016(12)
• [24]Tamás Mátrai; János Tóth.Comparative Assessment of Public Bike Sharing Systems[J]. Transportation Research Procedia.2016(05)
• [25] Subasish Das; Xiaoduan Sun; Anandi Dutta.Investigating User Ridership Sentiments for Bike Sharing Programs[J]. Journal of Transportation Technologies.2015:69-75
• [26] Côme Etienne; Oukhellou Latifa.Model-Based Count Series Clustering for Bike Sharing System Usage Mining: A Case Study with the Vélib’ System of Paris[J]. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST).2014:1-21
• [27]Virginija Grybaitė; Jelena Stankevičienė.Motives for participation in the sharing economy– evidence from Lithuania[J]. Ekonomia i Zarzadzanie.2016(10):7-17
• [28]Tae Hyup Roh.The Sharing Economy: Business Cases of Social Enterprises Using Collaborative Networks[J]. Procedia Computer Science.2016(10)
• [29]Lars Böcker; Toon Meelen.Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation[J]. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.2016(09)
• [30] Daniel G. Cockayne.Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy[J]. Geoforum.2016(10)
• [31]Dan Wang; Juan L. Nicolau.Price Determinants of Sharing Economy Based Accommodation Rental: A Study of Listings from 33 Cities on Airbnb.com[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management.2016(10)