企业社会责任表现对公司雇员决策的影响—基于中国A股上市公司的实证分析

DOI: https://journal.apaph.com/article-detail?id=2102277137695944706

关键词:

ESG评分企业就业水平调节效应

摘要

本研究选取2011—2021年沪深A股上市公司为样本,依托多类理论,探究ESG评分对企业就业水平的影响,以及工资水平、成长能力、所有制的调节作用,弥补现有研究边界条件分析的短板。研究采用双向固定效应模型开展实证检验,结果表明:ESG评分在1%水平上显著正向影响企业就业水平,评分每提升一单位,就业水平平均提升3.49%;工资水平、成长能力分别在10%、1%水平发挥正向调节作用,所有制调节效应不显著。稳健性检验证实结论可靠。本研究拓展了ESG相关理论应用,具备一定学术价值。

文献引用

  • [1]付礼菲, 汤美润, 何跃勇. 积极建言还是消极离职?员工感知CSR的差异化反应——以组织认同为中介变量的PLS-SEM分析[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(5): 1920–1931. [2]任湘郴, 杨立邦, 任腾. 企业社会责任对员工工作绩效的跨层次作用研究——基于组织认同感的中介作用[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2017(4): 61–66. [3]张斯琴, 董钟. ESG表现对企业价值的影响——基于绿色技术创新的中介效应研究[J]. 中国资产评估, 2025(3): 60–69. [4]熊冠星, 李爱梅, 王笑天, 等. 员工薪酬感知域差与离职决策研究——基于齐当别决策模型视角[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(7): 193–204. [5]BOWEN H R. Social responsibilities of the businessman[M]. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953. [6]CARROLL A B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4(4): 497–505. [7]CLARKSON M B E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(1): 92–117. [8]DAVIS K. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities?[J]. California Management Review, 1960, 3(2): 70–77. [9]FREEMAN R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. [10]LEE T W, MITCHELL T R. An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(1): 51–89. [11]MARCH J G, SIMON H A. Organizations[M]. New York: Wiley, 1958. [12]MOBLEY W H. Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62(2): 237–240. [13]PRICE J L. The study of turnover[M]. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1977. [14]SHELDON O. The philosophy of management[M]. London: Sir I. Pitman, 1924. [15]TAJFEL H, TURNER J C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict[M]//AUSTIN W G, WORCHEL S. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole, 1979: 33–48. [16]WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. From obligation to motivation: why employee engagement is the key to ESG success[R]. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2024. [17]ZHANG X, LI Y, KIM H. ESG practices and green innovation: the mediating role of organizational pride and the moderating effect of innovation climate[J]. Systems, 2025, 13(11): 986. [18]ZHOU S. "Sticking to One's Post" or "Backing the Right Captain"? The Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Employee Turnover[J]. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 2023, 32(4): 689–705.
长江文库INTERNATIONALHKAPACBR维普HK Asia-Pacific珠海市明日星科技
智慧法治与社会 ©2025 已获得 CC BY 4.0 许可